HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY

FACULTY OF LAW

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW STUDY PROGRAMME

Document No.

SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN

COURSE

REGISTRY NO.

COURSE GROUPING

Credit Score (SKS/ECTS)

SEMESTER

DRAFTING DATE

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

208B2114

State Administrative Law

T=4

P=0

3

August 2020

AUTHORIZATION

Vice Dean for Academic Affairs, Research and Innovation

Prof. Dr. Hamzah Halim, S.H., M.H.

Semester Learning Plan Editor

Study Plan Head Coordinator

Head of Study Programme

Prof. Dr. Abdul Razak, S.H., M.H.

Prof. Dr. Abdul Razak, S.H., M.H.

Prof. Dr. Achmad Ruslan, S.H., M.H.

Expected Learning Outcomes

Study Programme Expected Learning Outcome (ELO)

ELO 1

ELO 2

ELO 3

ELO 4

ELO 5

ELO 7

Able to internalize the noble characters and morals of Pancasila

Able to work both independently and in group

Able to communicate verbally and in written form

Able to build legal argumentation both logically, critically, and systematically

Able to analyze the theoretical concepts of basic in the field of State Administrative Law

Able to design a solution of legal cases in the field of State Administrative through the application of juridical thinking methods, theoretical knowledge and statutory regulations

Course-related Intended Learning Outcome (CILO)

CILO

Able to analyze basic concepts in the context of implementing state administration or government as capital in solving legal problems, especially in the field of government (executive).

ELO =>  Sub-CILO

ELO 1,3

Sub-CILO 1 Able to describe the introductory material for State Administrative Law

ELO 1,3,5

Sub-CILO 2 Able to connect State Administrative Law with Constitutional Law

ELO 1,2,5

Sub-CILO 3 Able to describe the sources of State Administrative Law

ELO 1,2,5

Sub-CILO 4 Able to describe the legal position of the government

ELO 1,2,5

Sub-CILO 5 Able to describe government authorities

ELO 1,2,5

Sub-CILO 6 Able to analyze discretion

ELO 1,3,5

Sub-CILO 7 Able to classify various kinds of government actions

ELO 1,4,7

Sub-CILO 8 Able to distinguish government instruments

ELO 1,3,5

Sub-CILO 9 Able to describe the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB)

ELO 1,4,7

Sub-CILO 10 Able to distinguish types of abuse of authority

ELO 1,4,7

Sub-CILO 11 Able to distinguish the forms of supervision that can be carried out by the government

ELO 1,4,7

Sub-CILO 12 Able to analyze legal protection to the community and the government's legal responsibility

ELO 1,4,7

Sub-CILO 13 Able to analyze the authority of the State Administrative Court

ELO 1,3,5

Sub-CILO 14 Able to distinguish administrative sanctions

Short Course Description

A brief description of this course discusses the definition and scope of State Administrative Law, terminology, development of State Administrative Law, Relationship of State Administrative Law with constitutional law, sources of State Administrative Law, definition of government, legal position of government, governmental authority, discretion, government actions, legal instruments Government, AUPB, Abuse of Authority, Supervision, Legal Protection and Government Legal Responsibility, Administrative Court, Law Enforcement in State Administrative Law and Sanctions.

Study/Learning Materials

Definition and scope of State Administrative Law, terminology, development of State Administrative Law, Relationship of State Administrative Law with constitutional law, sources of State Administrative Law, definition of government, legal position of government, governmental authority, discretion, government action, government legal instruments, AUPB, abuse of authority , Supervision, Legal protection and Government legal accountability, Administrative Court, Law enforcement in State Administrative Law and Sanctions.

References

Primary :

1. Ridwan HR, 2003, Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
2. Diana Halim Koentjoro, 2004, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Ghalia Indonesia, Yakarta.
3. Sadjijono, 2008, Memahami Beberapa Bab Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, LaksBang Prescindo, Yogyakarta.
4. Philipus M. Hadjon, 2001, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
5. Safri Nugraha dkk, 2007, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Center for Law and Good Governance Studies (CLGS) FH-UI, Jakarta.
6. SF. Marbun dkk, 2001, Dimensi-dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
7. SF. Marbun dkk, 1987, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
8. SF. Marbun, 2003, Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administrasi di Indonesia, Yogyakarta, UII Press.
9. Prajudi Atmosudirjo, 1994, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Cetakan Ke-10, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta,
10. Bachsan Mustafa, 1979, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, Alumni, Bandung.
11. Khrisna D. Darumurti, 2012, Kekuasaan Diskresi Pemerintah, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
12. Abdul Latief, 2005, Hukum dan Peraturan Kebijaksanaan (Beleidsregel) pada Pemerintahan Daerah, Yogyakarta: UII Press.
13. Cekli Setya Pratiwi, dkk, 2016, Penjelasan Hukum Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik (AUPB), Netherlands Embassy in Jakarta, Program Judicial Sector Support Programme.
14. Baharuddin Lopa, et.al, 1989, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
15. Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 2005, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan UU PTUN 2004, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
16. Philipus. M. Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Cetakan I, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya.
17. Sjachran Basah, 1985, Eksistensi dan Tolok Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia, Cetakan I, Alumni, Bandung. 
18. Irvan Mawardi, 2016, Paradigma Baru PTUN: Respom Peradilan administrasi Terhadap Demokratisasi, Penerbit thafa Media, Yogyakarta.
19. Maria Farida Indrati S, 2007, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan; Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan, Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
20. Tri Cahya Indra Permana, 2016, Catatan Kritis terhadap Perluasan Kewenangan Mengadili Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Genta Press, Yogyakarta.
21. Yodi Martono Wahyunadi, 2016, Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Ringkasan Disertasi, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta.
22. Jurnal: Dian Utami Mas Bakar, Audyna Mayasari Muin, Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris, Volume II Nomor 2 Desember 2018
23. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan

Supporting :

1. Daru P. Dharmo (Alih Bahasa) , 1983, Administrasi Negara, Erlangga, Yakarta.
2. Inu Kencana Syafiie, 2006, Sistem Administrasi Negara, Bumi  Aksara, Yogyakarta.
3. Amrah Muslimin, 1980, Beberapa Azas-Azas dan Pengertian-Pengertian Pokok tentang Administrasi dan Hukum Administrasi, Alumni, Bandung.
4. W.F. Prins, 1978, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Administrasi Negara, Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.
5. Lutfi Effendi, 2004, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi, Bayu Media Publishing, Malang.
6. E. Utrech, 1960, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara, FHUI, Jakarta.

Assigned Academic Staff

Prof. Dr. Abdul Razak, S.H., M.H.

Prof. Dr. Marthen Arie, S.H., M.H.

Prof. Dr. Marwati Riza, S.H., M.Si.

Dr. Anshory Illyas, S.H., M.H.

Dr. Andi Bau Inggit AR, S.H., M.H.

Ariani Arifin, S.H., M.H.

Dian Utami Mas Bakar, S.H., M.H.

Ruslan Hambali, S.H.,M.H.

Prerequisite Course

State Science

Constitutional Law

Meeting

Sub-CSLO

(Expected learning outcome in each study phase)

Grading

Study Forms,

Study Methods,

Student Assignments

 [ Estimated Duration ]

Learning Materials

[ Reference ]

Assessment Weight (%)

Indicator

(Evaluation) Criteria & Form

Offline

Online

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

1-3

Able to describe the introductory material for State Administrative Law

• Accuracy in describing 3 sub-materials:
  • Systematic reports
  • Writing
  • Literature Review
  • Results and Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Punctuality
  • Ability to express opinions
  • Discipline and politeness

Form: Written

(Task and Exercises)

Criteria:

7-9 = accurately describes 3 sub-materials, able to express opinions well, on time

4-6 = accurately describes 2 sub-materials, able to express opinions well, on time

1-3 = accurately describes 1 sub material, unable to express opinions well.

Face To Face (Optional)

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Interactive Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Collaborative Learning

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

• BP:
  • Interactive Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 1

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on the Tasks and Exercises

Introductory:

1. Definition and Scope of State Administrative Law
2. Terminology
3. State Administrative Law Development

References:

• ? Ridwan H.R., p. 9-12, 18-30
• ? Philipus M. Hadjon, dkk, p. 2-3, 29-32
• ? Safri Nugraha, dkk, Hukum,p. 2-4, 15-22.
• ? S.F. Marbun, Moh. Mahfud MD, p. 8-9.
• ? Prajudi Atmosudirjo, p. 59-60.

9

4

Able to connect State Administrative Law with Constitutional Law

• Accuracy in connecting State Administrative Law and Constitutional Law
• Ability to ask questions and express opinions
• Discipline and politeness

Form: Written (Exercises)

Criteria:

3-4 = accurately connecting the material, able to express opinions well, on time

1-2 = not quite right in connecting the material, able to express opinions quite well, on time

Face To Face

 (2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture

Virtual Meeting 

(2x50 minutes):

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture

BM (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 2

PT (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on the Exercises

The Relationship of State Administrative Law and Constitutional Law

References:

• ? Ridwan HR, p. 34-40

4

5

Able to describe the sources of State Administrative Law

• Accuracy in describing the materials:
  • Active in expressing opinions
  • The attitude in expressing opinions
  • Coverage of

material

• Answers to questions
• Discipline
• Conclusion
• Ability to Express Opinions
• Discipline Activeness in Class

Form: Written (Taks) and Discussion

Criteria:

3-4 = accurately describes 3 sub-materials well, able to express opinions well, ontime, active

1-2 = accurately describe 2 sub-materials quite well, able to express opinions quite well, on time, less active

Face To Face (Optional)

 (2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion

Virtual Meeting 

(2x50 minutes):

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion

BM (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 3

PT (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on the Tasks

Sources of the State Administrative Law.

1. Definition of Legal Source
2. Types of Legal Source
3. Formal Legal Sources and Material Legal Sources

References:

• ? Philipus M. Hadjon, dkk, p. 52.
• ? Ridwan H.R., p.41-50

4

6-7

Able to describe the legal position of the government

• Accuracy in describing the materials:
  • The attitude in expressing opinions
  • Coverage of

question material

• Answers to questions
• Discipline
• Conclusion
• Activeness in class
• Ability to Express Opinions

Form: Written (Tasks and Exercises) and Discussion

Criteria:

4-6 = accurately describes 2 sub-materials well, able to express opinions well, on time, active

1-3 = accurately describes 1 sub-material quite well, able to express opinions quite well, on time, less active

Face To Face

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 4

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on the Tasks and Exercises

Definition of Government and Government Legal Position

• Public Law
• Private Law

References:

• ? Ridwan H.R., p. 19-21, 51-64
• ? Diana Halim Koentjoro, p. 22-26.

6

8-9

Able to describe government authorities

• Accuracy in describing the materials:
  • The attitude in expressing opinions
  • Coverage of

question material

• Answers to questions
• Discipline
• Conclusion
• Activeness in class
• Ability to express opinions

Form: Written (Tasks and Exercises) and Discussion

Criteria:

4-6 = accurately describes 2 sub materials well, active

1-3 = accurately describes 1 sub material well, active

Face To Face

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 5

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on the Tasks and Exercises

Government Authorities

• Basic Concept of Auhority
• How to gain Authority

References:

• ? Safri Nugraha, p. 28-37
• ? Prajudi Atmosudirdjo, p. 78.
• ? Ridwan H.R., p. 65-780

6

10-11

Able to analyze discretion

• Accuracy in analyzing the materials:
  • The attitude in expressing opinions
  • Coverage of

question material

• Answers to questions
• Discipline
• Conclusion

Form: Written (Tasks) and Discussion

Criteria:

4-6 = Accurately analyzes the material well, able to express opinions well, active

1-3 = Accurately analyzes the material quite well, able to express opinions quite well, active

Face To Face

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Discussion

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 6

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants access and read journals related through the link feature in the learning media and then work on the Tasks

Freedom of Action (Discretion)

References:

• ? Ridwan H.R., p. 130-134, 188.
• ? Khrisna D. Darumurti, p. 90-102.
• ? Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration

6

12

Able to classify various kinds of government actions

• Accuracy in classifying the materials:
  • Systematic reports
  • Writing
  • Literature Review
  • Results and Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Punctuality
  • Ability to express opinions
  • Activeness in class

Form: Written (Tasks)

Criteria:

3-4 = Accurately classifies material well, able to express opinions well, active

1-2 = Accurately classifies material quite well, able to express opinions quite well, active

Face To Face (Optional)

 (2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Collaborative Learning

Virtual Meeting 

(2x50 minutes):

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture

BM (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 7

PT (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants make a paper about the materials

Government Actions

References:

• ? Ridwan HR, p. 109-122
• ? Sadjijono, p. 81, 84-85

13-20

Able to distinguish government instruments

• Accuracy in distinguishing the materials:
  • Issue of Identification
  • Connection to theory, principle, and legal basis
  • Recommendation
  • Ability to express opinions and ask questions
  • Discipline and Politeness
  • Activeness in discussions

Form: Written (Tasks and Exercises), Case Study and Discussion

Criteria:

Each 1 material is given a weight value = @ 4 if it is able to distinguish the material well,

punctual, able to express opinions well, active

Face To Face

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Small Group Discussion
    • Case Study

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 8

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on the tasks and exercises

Definition of Government Instruments;

Government Legal Instrument:

1. Legislation
2. State Administrative Decision
3. Policy Regulations

(Beleidregels)

1. Permissions
2. Het Plan (Plan)
3. Civil Law Instruments

References:

• ? Ridwan HR, p. 81, p. 125-139, 139-157, 169-173, 177-179, 196-209, 207, 213-225.
• ? Phillipus M. Hadjon, et.al., p. 137-138, 141-144, 152-153, 156,158
• ? Diana Halim and Koentjoro, p. 65.
• ? SF. Marbun, p. 178, 235,
• ? Jurnal Dian Utami Mas Bakar, Audyna Mayasari Muin, p. 119-130.
• ? Irvan Mawardi, p. 68-72
• ? Yodi Martono Wahyunadi, p. 141.
• ? Tri Cahya Indra Permana, p. 17, 20, 42-43-46
• ? Maria Farida Indrati S, p. 27.
• ? Abdul Latief, hlm. 92.
• ? Jurnal Philipus M Hadjon, Sadjijono, p. 78

24

21-22

Able to describe the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB)

• Accuracy in describing the materials:
  • Systematic reports
  • Writing
  • Literature Review
  • Results and Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Punctuality
  • Accuracy in analyzing questions
  • Ability to express opinions
  • Discipline

Form: Written (Tasks)

Kriteria:

4-6= Accurately describes 3 sub-materials, able to express opinions well, on time

1-3 = Accurately describes 2 sub-materials, able to express opinions quite well, on time

Face To Face

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Collaborative Learning

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 9

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on the tasks

General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB):

1. Terminology, Definition, and Position of AUPB.
2. History of AUPB
3. Principles in AUPB

References:

• ? Cekli Setya Pratiwi, et al, p. 25-35
• ? Ridwan HR, p. 244-264

6

23

Able to distinguish types of abuse of authority

• Accuracy in distinguishing the materials:
  • Issue of Identification
  • Connection to theory, principle, and legal basis
  • Recommendation
  • Discipline and Politeness
  • Ability to express opinions
  • Activeness in class

Form: Written (Tasks) and

Case Study

Kriteria:

3-4 = accurately distinguishes material, active, punctual, able to express opinions well

1-2 = less accurate in distinguishing material, active, punctual, able to express opinions quite well

Face To Face

 (2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Problem Based Learning (Case Study)

Virtual Meeting 

(2x50 minutes):

BM (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 10
• Course participants download the case position in the Learning Media

PT (2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on and upload group tasks on learning media

Abuse of Authority;

• Exceeding Authority
• Mixing Authority
• Acting Arbitrarily

References:

• ?Safri Nugraha. Et al, p .37-41.
• ?Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration

4

24-25

Able to distinguish the forms of supervision that can be carried out by the government

• Accuracy in distinguishing the materials:
  • Issue of Identification
  • Connection to theory, principle, and legal basis
  • Recommendation
  • Discipline and Politeness
  • Ability to express opinions

Form: Written (Tasks) and

Case Study

Kriteria:

4-6 = Accurately distinguishes the form of supervision that can be carried out by the government, on time, able to express opinions well

1-3 = less accurate in distinguishing the form of supervision that can be carried out by the government, on time, able to express opinions quite well

Face To Face (Optional)

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Problem Based Learning (Case Study)

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 11
• Course participants download the case position in the Learning Media

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants answer the questions in the Learning Media
• Course participants work on the tasks

Supervision;

1. Internal and External Supervision
2. Preventive and Repressive Supervision

References:

• ? SF Marbun, p. 261-275
• ? Safri Nugraha, p. 390-394.

6

26-27

Able to analyze legal protection to the community and the government's legal responsibility

• Accuracy in analyzing the materials:
  • Issue of Identification
  • Connection to theory, principle, and legal basis
  • Recommendation
  • Discipline and Politeness
  • Ability to express opinions

Form: Written (Tasks and Exercises) and

Case Study

Kriteria:

4-6 = Accurately analyzes the material, on time, able to express opinions well

1-3 = Less accurate in analyzing the material, on time, able to express opinions well

Face To Face (Optional)

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Problem Based Learning (Case Study)

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 12
• Course participants download the case position in the Learning Media

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants answer the questions in the Learning Media
• Course participants do the tasks and exercises

Legal Protection;

Government Legal Responsibility;

Government Action Disputes;

Dsputes of Unlawful Acts

References:

• ? Ridwan HR, p. 209-.
• ? Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2019

6

28-30

Able to analyze the authority of the State Administrative Court

• Accuracy in analyzing 3 sub-materials:
  • Issue of Identification
  • Connection to theory, principle, and legal basis
  • Recommendation
  • Discipline and Politeness
  • Ability to express opinions

Form: Written (Tasks) and

Case Study

Kriteria:

7-9 = Accurately nalyzes 3 sub-materials, able to express opinions well, on time

4-6 = Accurately analyzes 2 sub-materials, able to express opinions well, on time

1-3 = Accurately analyzes 1 sub material, able to express opinions quite well.

Face To Face

 (@2x50 minutes)

• BP:
  • Lecture
  • MP:
    • Lecture
    • Problem Based Learning (Case Study)

Virtual Meeting 

(@2x50 minutes):

BM (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants read Module 13
• Course participants download the case position in the Learning Media

PT (@2x60 minutes):

• Course participants work on and upload group tasks on learning media

State Administrative Court (PTUN)

• Background to the Establishment of the Administrative Court (PTUN)
• PTUN Comptencies
• Administrative Disputes

References:

• ? Mar